If you’ve done even a little research on retirement planning, you’ve probably come across the 4% Rule. It’s one of the most cited—and misunderstood—retirement strategies out there.
In Episode 91 of the Last Paycheck podcast, CERTIFIED FINANCIAL PLANNER® Archie Hoxton and advisor Jimmy Sutch take a fresh look at this popular rule of thumb. They explore where it came from, how it works, and most importantly—why it’s a starting point, not a solution.
What Is the 4% Rule?
The 4% Rule suggests that if you withdraw 4% of your retirement portfolio each year, adjusted for inflation, your money should last 30 years. It’s based on historical data, assuming a balanced 50/50 stock and bond allocation.
For example, if you have $1 million saved, the rule says you could withdraw $40,000 in your first year of retirement, and increase that amount slightly each year to keep pace with inflation.

Why It’s Popular—and Where It Falls Short
The 4% Rule is simple. That’s part of its appeal. But real life rarely follows the neat assumptions built into the original model.
Here’s where the 4% Rule runs into trouble:
- It assumes a fixed 30-year retirement. What if you retire early and live into your 90s?
- It assumes steady market performance. What if you hit a bear market in the first few years?
- It assumes predictable spending. What if you need to fund long-term care or help a family member unexpectedly?
Archie and Jimmy explain that while the rule is helpful for rough estimates, it ignores the fluid nature of real-life retirement planning. Retirees often need to spend more early in retirement before Social Security kicks in—or during high-spending years like early travel or home renovations.
Ask Yourself:
- Is my retirement plan flexible enough to handle early market downturns?
- Have I adjusted for taxes, healthcare, and changing income needs over time?
- Am I prepared to draw more than 4% some years—and less in others?
A Better Approach: Dynamic Planning
Archie and Jimmy encourage listeners to treat the 4% Rule as a guideline, not gospel. Instead of a fixed rule, they recommend:
- Creating spending guardrails that adjust for market performance
- Using tax-efficient withdrawal sequencing based on account type and income
- Coordinating Social Security timing with drawdown strategies
- Re-evaluating the plan annually—not just once at retirement

Final Thought
The 4% Rule can be useful when you’re asking, “Do I have enough to retire?” But when you’re asking, “How do I make this money last through uncertainty?”—you need something more personal, more flexible, and more strategic.